The 2026 Kakobuy Spreadsheet Year in Numbers
Data this note rests on: One extraction date, one source marketplace and 195 entries: a full year of this ledger that cannot be compared with 2025 on the same basis, because no 2025 extraction exists to compare it with.
The year in numbers
One date, 2026-09-29 in week 40 of the year, is the entire time span of this record. That single extraction is the honest shape of the ledger's first year: one snapshot, 195 entries, and no second observation of the same fields to compare it against. Nothing in this article is a growth figure, a rate, or a year-over-year change, because a change needs two measurements and this record has one.
What the year does contain is a complete census of one pool on one day. Every entry comes from the eight category views of a single source marketplace, which makes the pool narrow in a way that is easy to forget when reading a category table. All 195 records are attributed to Weidian; no other platform contributes a row. The narrowness is a limitation of the record, and it is also what makes the figures reproducible: one source, one date, one set of extraction rules.
| Measure | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Extraction dates in the record | 1 date, 2026-09-29 | A single pass over the eight category views of the source marketplace. |
| Entries | 195 | Deduplicated by item identifier across the eight category views. |
| Categories | 8 | Shoes, Hoodies and Sweaters, T-Shirts, Jackets, Pants and Shorts, Headwear, Accessories, Other Items. |
| Brands | 20 distinct values | Distinct values in the recorded brand field, with empty values excluded. |
| Source platforms | 1, Weidian for all 195 rows | The platform field as recorded per entry on the extraction date. |
| Price range and median | $5.17 to $451.10, median $31.76 | Recorded item price per entry, in US dollars. |
| Images | 2,806 in total, median 14 per entry | Image group size per entry, ranging from 1 to 46 images. |
| Index split | 158 above the five-image threshold, 37 below | The published index rule, applied to every row the same way. |
| Verification split | 158 verified, 0 watching, 37 unverified | Status derived from two fields and one threshold, published on the method page. |
- Source:
- The entry pool extracted on 2026-09-29 and the field rules published with the records on this site.
- Sample:
- n = 195 entries across 8 categories and 20 brands, all from one source marketplace.
- Recorded:
- 2026-W40
- Known gap:
- One extraction point in a year that is not finished. No entry was observed twice, so the record supports a census and not a trend.
The category table below is the centre of the year, and it is the only place where the pool divides into groups large enough to compare without the comparison collapsing into single rows. Category counts run from 24 to 26 entries, which is close enough to even that no category dominates the pool by volume. What differs is price.
| Category | Entries | Range | Median | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shoes | 24 | $24.09 to $100.84 | $68.68 | /vault/shoes/ |
| Hoodies and Sweaters | 26 | $12.13 to $101.88 | $37.18 | /vault/hoodies-sweaters/ |
| T-Shirts | 24 | $13.61 to $45.36 | $22.23 | /vault/t-shirts/ |
| Jackets | 24 | $19.06 to $156.27 | $53.89 | /vault/jackets/ |
| Pants and Shorts | 25 | $16.07 to $69.20 | $44.62 | /vault/pants-shorts/ |
| Headwear | 24 | $7.94 to $32.12 | $16.22 | /vault/headwear/ |
| Accessories | 24 | $5.17 to $451.10 | $26.77 | /vault/accessories/ |
| Other Items | 24 | $13.88 to $89.12 | $35.81 | /vault/other-stuff/ |
- Source:
- Category, price and count fields recorded per entry in the pool extracted on 2026-09-29, one row per category view on this site.
- Sample:
- n = 195 entries, with 24 to 26 entries in each of the 8 categories.
- Recorded:
- 2026-W40
- Known gap:
- One price and one category per entry at one date. The table describes spread across items in September 2026 and says nothing about how any of these prices moved during the year.
Two features of that table are worth naming. The first is the spread between category medians, which runs from $16.22 in Headwear to $68.68 in Shoes, a factor of roughly four. The second is the Accessories row, whose median of $26.77 sits above a maximum of $451.10: the cheapest entry in the whole pool and the most expensive one are both in that category, which is the clearest argument on this site against reading a category by its median alone.
The year referred to here is 2026 through week 40. The extraction date of 2026-09-29 sits near the end of the third quarter, so the record covers the part of the year that has already happened rather than a completed calendar year, and the remaining weeks are not represented in any figure.
Against the previous year
A same-basis comparison with 2025 cannot be made from this data, and the reason is structural rather than technical. No 2025 extraction of these fields exists on this site. There is no earlier price for any entry, no earlier image count, no earlier record of which entries were listed, and no earlier version of the parameter table. Producing a percentage change from a single observation is not a difficult calculation; it is an invented one, and it would be indistinguishable on the page from a real figure.
What can be compared is a different kind of number: the magnitude claims that circulate in public discussion of agent spreadsheets, where figures such as 2,200 or more entries, 6,000 or more, 10,000 or more, and 100,000 or more appear. Those claims differ from each other by a factor of roughly 45 between the smallest and the largest, which is far more than any plausible difference in what a spreadsheet contains. The spread is explained by the absence of a stated basis: a count without a date, without a platform mix, and without a deduplication rule can be almost any number and remain defensible to the person who wrote it.
| Figure as claimed | Date stated | Basis stated | What checking it would need |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2,200 or more entries | None | None | A dated extraction with a stated source set and a deduplication rule. |
| 6,000 or more entries | None | None | The same, plus a statement of whether variants count as separate rows. |
| 10,000 or more entries | None | None | The same, plus a rule for entries that appear in several category views. |
| 100,000 or more entries | None | None | The same, plus an explanation of how a pool of that size was enumerated at all. |
| 195 entries, this ledger | 2026-09-29 | Eight category views of one marketplace, deduplicated by item identifier | A second extraction on the same basis, which does not yet exist. |
- Source:
- Entry-count figures as they appear in public discussion of agent spreadsheets, recorded as text rather than as data.
- Sample:
- No qualifying sample yet. Counting the claims would require a defined population of sources and a collection window, neither of which is established here.
- Recorded:
- 2026-W40
- Known gap:
- None of the claims carries a methodology, so none can be reproduced or refuted from the outside. The table records the shape of each claim, not its accuracy, and it does not assert that the claims are false.
The point of that table is not that 195 is the correct number and the larger ones are wrong. The point is that a count without a date and a basis cannot be used for anything: it cannot be compared with another count, it cannot be updated, and it cannot be wrong in a way anybody could demonstrate. A smaller figure with a stated rule is more useful than a larger one without.
For next year to support a real comparison, five things would have to stay fixed while a second extraction is taken: the date, the set of source views, the field definitions, the deduplication rule, and the index threshold. Change any one of them and the two observations measure different things, which is the ordinary failure mode of year-over-year tables. The requirements are set out in the last section because they are the useful part of this section, not the apology.
Structural changes
Three changes in the wider picture shaped what a record like this has to carry during 2026, and each one shows up in the field structure rather than in the price figures. None of them is a change this site measured; they are changes in the environment the record describes.
- European discussion of assessing duty by category rather than by item. Where a category becomes the unit of assessment, three items of the same kind can count as one unit instead of three, which changes how a basket is described before any value question is asked.
- Public discussion of threshold adjustments across several destinations, which is why the six-country parameter table on this site carries a check week on every row rather than a single publication date.
- The arrival of row-level check dates as ordinary practice. A row that states the week it was checked can be used by somebody who did not write it; a row without a date cannot, and the difference costs nothing to produce.
The third change is the one this ledger can demonstrate from its own structure, because every one of the 195 rows carries the review week 2026-W40. That field did not exist in the shared sheets this site was built to replace, and its absence is the single most common reason a reader cannot tell whether a figure is current. Adding it converts an undated claim into a dated one without changing the claim itself.
| Practice | State before | State now | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Row-level check date | Absent: a sheet carried one date, if any, for the whole document | Every one of the 195 rows carries a review week, currently 2026-W40 | A reader can tell whether a figure was checked this week or inherited. |
| Index threshold | Unstated: all rows treated as equally publishable | Image group of five or more reaches the index; 158 rows in, 37 out | The exclusion rule is published before the count, so the count is reproducible. |
| Status derivation | Implied by whoever maintained the sheet | Two fields and one threshold, published on the method page | A status can be recomputed by a reader instead of being taken on trust. |
| Unverified fee fields | Counted as zero, which made an unknown look free | Excluded from every instrument total and labelled on the row | An unpriced fee is shown as unknown rather than as a saving. |
| Measured size evidence | Filled with estimates and seller charts | Table remains empty until a measured sample exists | An empty table is more useful than one built from transcribed claims. |
- Source:
- The field structure of the records on this site, the published method page, and the behaviour of the instruments that consume the same fields.
- Sample:
- n = 195 rows, each carrying a review week; the index threshold partitions the same 195 rows into 158 and 37.
- Recorded:
- 2026-W40
- Known gap:
- This table describes practice inside one ledger. Other sheets may follow the same conventions or none of them, and no outside observation is held here to compare against.
Whether the per-category reading becomes the settled rule in any destination is not something this site can report. No ruling text is held here, and the parameter table records published thresholds and rates rather than the outcome of any assessment.
What next year likely holds
A useful annual article needs two observations and a stable basis. This one has one observation, so the honest version of a forward-looking section is a list of requirements rather than a set of forecasts. If the requirements are met, the next edition of this article can contain a real comparison; if they are not, it will contain another census, which is still worth publishing and is a different document.
| Requirement | Why it is needed | Held now |
|---|---|---|
| A second extraction on the same date in the following year | Two observations at a comparable point in the calendar are the minimum for any change figure. | No |
| A record of rows that disappeared | A count that only ever grows cannot show whether items were delisted or replaced. | No |
| Unchanged field definitions and thresholds | A changed definition produces a difference that belongs to the rule rather than to the pool. | Yes, for the current fields |
| An unchanged deduplication rule | Identifier-level deduplication is what keeps the same item from being counted in two category views. | Yes |
| A recorded platform mix | The pool is one platform today; a second platform would change what the pool represents. | Yes, one value recorded for all 195 rows |
- Source:
- The field definitions and extraction rules used for the 2026-09-29 pool, read against what a comparison would require.
- Sample:
- No qualifying sample yet: the requirements describe a future observation, so no current data can be counted against them.
- Recorded:
- 2026-W40
- Known gap:
- The rows marked as held describe the present record only. Nothing here predicts prices, entry counts, thresholds, or clearance outcomes for the coming year, and no such prediction is made anywhere on this site.
- The image threshold will keep binding, because it is the one field comparison that can be applied to every row without a request. A future pool with thinner galleries will produce a larger unverified count for that reason alone, which is a property of the rule rather than of the items.
- The platform mix is the largest unknown. Every row here comes from one marketplace, and a second platform would change the price distribution and the image distribution at the same time, which is why it is recorded as a field rather than described in prose.
- Category-level assessment questions will keep arriving, because the difference between one unit and three changes a total without changing a basket, and no amount of value planning resolves it.
- The most likely improvement to this record is not a bigger pool but a second date on the existing one. One dated pool can answer questions about spread; two dated pools can answer questions about movement, and the second is what readers actually ask for.
No forecast of prices, thresholds, clearance rates or delivery times is made in this article. Each of those would need either a second observation or a sample of outcomes, and this site holds neither. The requirements table above is the closest thing to a prediction here, and it is a statement about method rather than about the market.
The full record sits at /vault/, with the eight category views gathered beneath it, and each figure in this article can be traced back to the rows that produce it. That trace is the only claim this year can make with confidence: everything counted here was counted once, on a stated date, by a stated rule, from a stated source.